![]() ![]() |
|||
Old-Growth Forests Can Accumulate Carbon in Soils | |||
作者:Guoyi Zhou, Sh… 文章来源:science 点击数 更新时间:2006/12/6 15:48:15 文章录入:anny 责任编辑:anny | |||
|
|||
Old-Growth Forests Can Accumulate Carbon in Soils![]()
Old-growth forests have traditionally been considered negligible as carbon sinks because carbon uptake has been thought to be balanced by respiration. We show that the top 20-centimeter soil layer in preserved old-growth forests in southern China accumulated atmospheric carbon at an unexpectedly high average rate of 0.61 megagrams of carbon hectare-1 year-1 from 1979 to 2003. This study suggests that the carbon cycle processes in the belowground system of these forests are changing in response to the changing environment. The result directly challenges the prevailing belief in ecosystem ecology regarding carbon budget in old-growth forests and supports the establishment of a new, nonequilibrium conceptual framework to study soil carbon dynamics 1 South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China. * These authors contribute equally to this work.
Old-growth forests have traditionally been considered negligible as carbon sinks because carbon uptake has been thought to be balanced by respiration (1). We show that soils in the top 20-cm soil layer in preserved old-growth forests in southern China accumulated atmospheric carbon at an unexpectedly high rate from 1979 to 2003. This phenomenon indicates the need for future research on the complex responses and adaptation of belowground processes to global environmental change. Understanding the locations and driving forces of carbon sources and sinks at plot-to-global scales is critical for the prediction and management of the global carbon cycle and ultimately the behavior of the Earth's climate system (2). Major uncertainties remain in the geospatial distribution of terrestrial carbon sources and sinks and the mechanisms that drive the distribution and its change. Research efforts have largely been focused on the investigation and quantification of the impacts of climate variability and land use activities on the carbon cycle at various spatial and temporal scales. The soil carbon balance of old-growth forests has received little attention. It is generally accepted that soil organic carbon (SOC) levels in old-growth forests are in a steady state (1). To our knowledge, the long-term dynamics of SOC in old-growth forests and the validity of the above perception have not been tested. We conducted a study to measure the long-term dynamics (1979 to 2003) of SOC stock in old-growth forests [age > 400 years (3)] at the Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (23°09'21''N to 23°11'30''N and 112°30'39''E to 112°33'41''E) in Guangdong Province, China. The estimation of SOC stock change requires a series of measurements of SOC concentration, bulk density, and soil thickness taken at different points in time (4, 5). In this study, we observed long-term changes in SOC concentration and bulk density but did not measure changes in soil thickness in the old-growth forests. Although soil thickness dynamics were not monitored, their possible contribution to the uncertainty in the results was analyzed and quantified by using upper and lower bounds of possible SOC change (Materials and Methods). Results show that SOC concentration in the top 20-cm soil layer increased between 1979 and 2003 from about 1.4% to 2.35% at an average rate of 0.035% each year, which was significantly different from 0 at
The driving forces for this observed high rate of SOC increase in the old-growth forests are not clear at present and deserve further study. This study suggests that the carbon cycle processes in the belowground system of these forests are changing in response to the changing environment. This result directly challenges the prevailing belief in ecosystem ecology regarding carbon budget in old-growth forests (1) and supports the establishment of a new, non-equilibrium conceptual framework to study soil carbon dynamics. Our study further highlights the need to focus on the complexity of the belowground processes, as advocated in previous research (6, 7), and the importance of establishing long-term observation studies on the responses of belowground processes to global change.
|
|||
![]() ![]() |